top of page
01-2.jpg

Blog

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Opening New Doors to Inclusion: The Importance of Cross-Sector Collaboration


In today’s corporate management landscape, promoting employment opportunities for people with disabilities (PWDs) is not just a social responsibility. It is a key driver of long-term business value and competitiveness. With the global focus on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) growing, and challenges such as aging population and the increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses (e.g., strokes[1], heart disease[2], and cancer[3]) among younger demographics, the proportion of PWDs in the workforce is rising. As a result, disability employment has become a pressing issue in both societal and corporate contexts.


In the past, society has placed the responsibility for disability employment primarily on corporates’ HR departments. However, Dr. Echo Shang from The Education University of Hong Kong (EdUHK) has introduced the co-creation pathway for inclusion: CIP Framework[4], which highlights key gaps in conventional approaches. Many policies focus narrowly on “providing job opportunities”, but fail to address critical areas such as:

  1. Supporting PWDs in developing self-agency and competencies.

  2. Enhancing accessibility in communities and workplaces through universally designed infrastructure.

  3. Establishing a long-term and sustainable support network to promote inclusion in the community and workplace.


To address these challenges, the CIP Framework proposes three key principles:

  1. Agency-First Model: Empower PWDs to actively plan their life and career that align with their unique bio-psycho-social needs and wills.

  2. Co-Production Mechanism: Foster collaboration across multiple sectors (e.g. corporates, policymakers, NGOs, and PWD communities) to ensure policies and resources address real-world needs.

  3. Ecosystem-building Principle: Bring together diverse stakeholders to cultivate a culture of inclusion and sustain long-term progress in disability employment.


How Can Different Stakeholders Support and Promote Inclusive Employment?

The following table outlines actionable practices for disability employment, aligned with SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) and ESG categories, and identifies the key stakeholders involved:

ree

ESG Categories (For Reference Only)

  • Social Responsibility (Community Engagement)


Practical Action Examples for Inclusive Employment

  • Provide mandatory Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI) value education curricula across higher education and K-12 education.

  • Partner with vocational training institutions to provide internships or apprenticeships for PWDs, helping them explore suitable industries and roles.

  • Implement mentorship programmes during internships to help PWDs understand workplace culture.


Key Stakeholders

  • Educational institutions (higher education institutions, K-12 schools)

  • Vocational training institutions

  • Rehabilitation organizations

  • Schools with SEN

  • Corporates’ HR departments

ree

ESG Categories (For Reference Only)

  • Social Responsibility (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging, hereafter referred to as DEIB)


Practical Action Examples for Inclusive Employment

  • Ensure recruitment and employment processes are inclusive. Please refer to this link for more information.

  • Collaborate with rehabilitation organizations to implement universal design in the workplace and provide assistive tools to enhance accessibility (if any).


Key Stakeholders

  • Corporates’ HR departments

  • Rehabilitation organizations

ree

ESG Categories (For Reference Only)

  • Social Responsibility (DEIB)

  • Corporate Governance


Practical Action Examples for Inclusive Employment

  • Ensure equal pay and career development and advancement opportunities for PWDs.

  • Launch DEIB awareness campaigns to reduce colleagues’ unconscious bias associated with hiring PWDs.

  • Establish anti-discrimination policies and monitor the implementation outcomes.


Key Stakeholders

  • Disability employment advocacy organization/ Workplace inclusion consultants

  • Corporates’ HR departments

ree

ESG Categories (For Reference Only)

  • Social Responsibility (DEIB)


Practical Action Examples for Inclusive Employment

  • Ensure community and building follow universal design guidelines by the Architectural Services Department.

  • Improve public transport accessibility for people with diverse disabilities.

  • If feasible, support remote work options for PWDs with mobility challenges.


Key Stakeholders

  • Urban planners

  • Architects

  • Engineers and technicians engaging in community and building development

  • Transport service providers

  • Corporates’ HR departments

ree

ESG Categories (For Reference Only)

  • Corporate Governance


Practical Action Examples for Inclusive Employment

  • Establish a reporting mechanism to mediate discrimination and unfair complaint cases within the corporate at an early stage.


Key Stakeholders

  • Corporates’ Legal departments

  • Corporates’ HR departments


As shown above, promoting disability employment cannot rely solely on the efforts of corporates’ HR departments. Instead, it requires collaboration among professionals from various industries to co-enhance inclusion in both communities and workplaces.

Our research team is committed to raising awareness and fostering collaboration among diverse stakeholders to build inclusive societies and work environments. For more information or exploring collaboration opportunities, feel free to contact us at se-research@eduhk.hk.


About the Authors:

  • Dr. Echo Shang: Programme Leader of the Bachelor of Social Sciences (Honours) in Social Entrepreneurship and Development Studies, Assistant Professor at The Education University of Hong Kong | Official Website

  • Miss. Giny Chin: Certified ESG Planner, ICSD | LinkedIn Profile


[1] LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong (2025, March 29). 關注年輕中風[Concerning Young Stroke]. Newspaper Columns. https://www.med.hku.hk/zh-hk/media/knowledge-exchange/newspaper-columns/2025/mar/odn_20250329#

[2] CHAIR, S.Y. (2018, September 6). 心臟復康知多少[How Much Do You Know About Cardiac Rehabilitation?] The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. https://www.nur.cuhk.edu.hk/in-the-press/20180906-hkej-hk/

[3] Hospital Authority. (n.d.). CanSQS - all ages. Hong Kong Cancer Registry, Hospital Authority. https://www3.ha.org.hk/cancereg/allages.asp

[4] Shang, L., & Chandra, Y. (2025). Exploring Social Entrepreneurship Co-Production Processes in the Disability Sector: Individual and Collection Action Views. Journal of Social Policy54(1), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000077

Heatwaves in the UK: ESG Considerations for Building Resilience

Janet Ng, U.K. ESG Advocate


A heatwave had just swept parts of the UK last few weeks (Met Office, 2025). During the summer of 2022, the temperatures recorded in the UK, for the first time, reached 40°C and over 4,500 heat-related deaths were reported — served as a stark reminder for scientists and ESG professionals alike (Khosravi, et al., 2025). As climate change progresses, heatwaves are becoming more frequent, intense, and hazardous — highlighting the UK’s current challenges in preparedness and underscoring the need to strengthen environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies for greater resilience (Mehryar, et al., 2025).


Environmental Risk: Cooling, Carbon, and Cascading Impacts

For decades, UK housing and urban infrastructure have been designed to retain heat, not shed it. Now, with 82% of UK households reporting difficulty keeping at least one room cool — a fourfold increase since 2011 — residents are increasingly turning to air conditioning (AC) and electric fans (Khosravi, et al., 2025). AC ownership jumped from 3% in 2011 to nearly 20% in 2022, and is expected to rise further as summers warm (Khosravi, et al., 2025). This shift is environmentally risky. Increased AC use during peak hours strains the national grid and, when fossil fuels are used for backup, raises carbon emissions (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, 2025). More broadly, heatwaves drive cascading effects: wildfires, droughts, water shortages, and transport disruption. Many of these impacts are amplifications, not direct results, of heat, emerging from the interdependence of social, environmental, and infrastructure vulnerabilities (Mehryar, et al., 2025).


Social Impact: Inequality and Vulnerability

Heatwaves are not equal opportunity events. Lower-income groups are twice as likely to report overheating and are less able to afford active cooling technologies like AC, while younger adults are more likely than older adults to use such technologies. Elders, despite being at higher health risk from heat, often under-report discomfort and are less likely to perceive themselves as vulnerable or to adopt cooling measures (Khosravi, et al., 2025). Vulnerable populations, including those in poor-quality housing or with underlying health conditions, are disproportionately exposed and less able to adapt — issues that ESG frameworks must now foreground.


Governance: Integration and Proactive Policy

Current policies remain facing challenges, with adaptation and mitigation handled by separate agencies and considered in isolation (Howarth, et al., 2025). These policies focus remains on winter heating and decarbonisation, with little attention paid to sustainable cooling or adaptation for summer heat (Khosravi, et al., 2025). Scholars argue for a joined up approach — “Climate Resilient Net Zero” — that treats adaptation and mitigation as complementary goals rather than competing priorities. That means designing heat resilience into net zero pathways (e.g., passive cooling, green infrastructure, building fabric and low carbon cooling technologies), and ensuring policy, funding and governance align across sectors and scales (Howarth, et al., 2025).


Building Resilience

Heatwaves are here to stay. As the climate warms, the UK faces a clear ESG challenge: how to adapt equitably, sustainably, and at scale. This means shifting from reactive “quick fixes” to proactive, system-wide planning; integrating climate resilience into mitigation strategies; and ensuring the most vulnerable are neither left behind nor left to bear the brunt of inaction. ESG leadership in the age of heatwaves is no longer optional.


References:

Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, 2025. Understanding secondary heating behaviours Research findings (RAF067/2324). [Online] Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6889c9076478525675738fa5/secondary-heating-behaviours.pdf [Accessed 11 August 2025].


Howarth, C. et al., 2025. Integrating climate mitigation and adaptation in the UK: A new anticipatory narrative for achieving “Climate Resilient Net Zero” in preparing for heat risk. [Online] [Accessed 11 August 2025].


Khosravi, F. et al., 2025. A nation unprepared: Extreme heat and the need for adaptation in the United Kingdom. [Online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104065

[Accessed 11 August 2025].


Mehryar, S., Howarth, C. & Conway, D., 2025. Heat Risk Interdependencies in the UK: Implications for Adaptation. [Online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005797

[Accessed 11 August 2025].


Met Office, 2025. Heatwave on the way for some. [Online] Available at: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-media/media-centre/weather-and-climate-news/2025/heatwave-on-the-way-for-some [Accessed 11 August 2025].


(Date: 25th August, 2025)



On 19 August 2025, SGS’s experts delivered an inaugural CPD webinar on “Scope 3 emissions” for ICSD members to mark our strategic collaboration. More than 280 members participated



website-logo.png
International Chamber of Sustainable Development
CEP-transparent background_edited.png
CEM_logo_transparent_edited.png
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube

© 2025 International Chamber of Sustainable Development Limited | All Rights Reserved

bottom of page